An article on business for you, this Tuesday morning! This one focuses on the lack of women on the highest levels at tech start-ups, as well as some of the causes and some of the problems that can arise with this issue. And as you, my readers, are a little young to be on a tech start-up, perhaps this issue will minimize as you all age.
Insight: Tech start-ups show little imagination on board gender diversity, by Sarah McBride and Poornima Gupta in Reuters
Ah, yes, an easy read about food. Pine nuts specifically. I bet that was what you were thinking you wanted to read today when you came home from school. Right?
Anyway, same drill as always. Read at least the first paragraph. Mmmm.. pesto.
The Embarrassingly Obvious Truth About Where Pine Nuts Come From
I’ve gone down the New York Times sports rabbit hole. I bring you another article on sports, but more on the commentary side than inside the action. You probably would recognize Stuart Scott even if you don’t know his name, as he is one of the longest standing ESPN commentators out there. You also might notice that he’s gradually been thinning, as I did. This article gives a window into his 6 year battle with cancer, as he is now facing his third diagnosis.
Read on for a touching and intriguing battle story.
Stuart Scott’s Story of Perseverance, by Richard Sandomir in The New York Times
Great piece on three Native American players at Albany (instead of Syracuse). I knew almost nothing of the current status of Natives with respect to lacrosse and (obviously very mistakenly) thought there wasn’t much to it. But there’s more to it than just that Natives still play: these three kids are some of the best out there and for a team that breaks with tradition.
The Thompsons made a decision that seems unexceptional to outsiders — they chose to attend Albany, which is part of the state university system, instead of Syracuse. But to Native Americans, that decision was fraught with meaning.
Read on for more.
In a Native American Sport, a Family’s Giant Leap, Zach Schonbrun in The New York Times
In light of the major changes to the SAT announced for 2016, I’ve found a great article that highlights the very first SAT administered almost 90 years ago. It’s hard to believe just how different the SAT was back then, and makes the new changes seem almost minor.
Be sure to click on the yellow tabs/arrows on the left hand side of the document as you read through it. The comments are fascinating.
On the vocabulary subtest:
O’Reilly calls my attention to word bank and, more specifically, the fifth word from the top, allopathy. “I don’t even know what that means,” O’Reilly admits. “You would not see that on the SAT today.”
The vocabulary on the current SAT is meant to be at the same level as that of the New York Times.
I’m not sure if my favorite subtest is the classification substest or the artificial language subtest. Both seem pretty gnarly. Read on to see for yourself.
Document Deep Dive: What Was on the First SAT?, by Meghan Gambino of The Smithsonian
Ah, an interesting proposal to California’s Orca Bill that would impact our very own Sea World. I’ll defer to the article for the ins and outs of the legislation and its impacts, but suffice it to say that I find this fascinating.
Article here: What California’s Orca Bill Would Mean For San Diego’s SeaWorld, by City News Service on KPBS website
Ever wonder about the voice behind Wake Me Up, by Avicii? I did. The song is a study of contrasts: a beautiful lingering voice with some heavy pounding beats.
A quote from the lyricist/vocalist Aloe Blacc:
“It was just a moment where I felt like my life could get no better,” Blacc says. “You know, from indie-label struggling artist to first-class flights? I thought, “Wake me up when it’s all over.'”
Find out more about the voice (and lyricist) through this article:
Putting A Name And Face To A Famous Voice, from NPR.
Also available in audio form at the top of that page.
Brought to you by the folks at Esquire. This article is in interview format, so very readable. Read at least the first question/answer, although I do especially love the ending.
Meet the Guy Who Circumnavigated the Globe, by Chris Jones in Esquire
The best article I can find on the proposed changes to the SAT is currently by The New York Times. Kudos to them.
I grabbed some key changes from their website and highlighted my very favorite one below. Some key changes include:
• Instead of arcane “SAT words” (“depreciatory,” “membranous”), the vocabulary words on the new exam will be ones commonly used in college courses, such as “synthesis” and “empirical.”
• The essay, required since 2005, will become optional. Those who choose to write an essay will be asked to read a passage and analyze how its author used evidence, reasoning and stylistic elements to build an argument.
• The guessing penalty, in which points are deducted for incorrect answers, will be eliminated.
• The overall scoring will return to the old 1600 scales, based on a top score of 800 in reading and math. The essay will have a separate score.
Read on for more key changes over at The NYT. Very exciting!
Major Changes in SAT Announced by College Board, by Tamar Lewin in The New York Times
Conjecture about one of the league’s best power forwards who also happens to be championship-less. Sound familiar, anyone?
As always, please read at least the first paragraph.
Love Fine With Timberwolves but Hungry to Win by Pat Borzi at The New York Times